<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re all Aristoteleans now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebikeshow.net/were-all-aristoteleans-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebikeshow.net/were-all-aristoteleans-now/</link>
	<description>Podcast and blog of the world&#039;s most popular bicycling radio show, rolling since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:16:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://thebikeshow.net/were-all-aristoteleans-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4549</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebikeshow.net/were-all-aristoteleans-now/#comment-4549</guid>
		<description>@ Rob, I see cyclists as flexible shape-shifters, able to transcend the distinctions between walker and motorised vehicle. We can reach overtake cars descending the Ventoux but also ride carefully and considerately along a canal towpath, mixing easily with walkers. The laws should reflect the miracle of the bicycle.

@ Kim, you present more evidence - if it is needed - of what Buffalo Bill once said on the show: everyone hates cyclists but no-one hates cyclists more than cyclists. And on St Valentine&#039;s Day to boot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Rob, I see cyclists as flexible shape-shifters, able to transcend the distinctions between walker and motorised vehicle. We can reach overtake cars descending the Ventoux but also ride carefully and considerately along a canal towpath, mixing easily with walkers. The laws should reflect the miracle of the bicycle.</p>
<p>@ Kim, you present more evidence &#8211; if it is needed &#8211; of what Buffalo Bill once said on the show: everyone hates cyclists but no-one hates cyclists more than cyclists. And on St Valentine&#8217;s Day to boot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://thebikeshow.net/were-all-aristoteleans-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4546</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebikeshow.net/were-all-aristoteleans-now/#comment-4546</guid>
		<description>Interestingly enough &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bikebiz.com/news/31761/Red-light-running-cyclists-blastedby-cyclists&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;most cyclist don&#039;t like other cyclist jumping red lights either&lt;/a&gt;. A quick search of  a few cycling forums soon backs up this finding, as regular cyclist want cycling to be accepted as a legitimate form of transport by wider society, rather than just that of an urban sub group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough <a href="http://www.bikebiz.com/news/31761/Red-light-running-cyclists-blastedby-cyclists" rel="nofollow">most cyclist don&#8217;t like other cyclist jumping red lights either</a>. A quick search of  a few cycling forums soon backs up this finding, as regular cyclist want cycling to be accepted as a legitimate form of transport by wider society, rather than just that of an urban sub group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://thebikeshow.net/were-all-aristoteleans-now/comment-page-1/#comment-4540</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebikeshow.net/were-all-aristoteleans-now/#comment-4540</guid>
		<description>Not sure if Warburton has accurately stated your position, Jack, but I fear that by accepting a self-definition of &quot;quasi-pedestrians&quot; cyclists are one step away from being banned from the road at the whim of Highways officers. Surely that&#039;s too high a price for the privilege of shooting red lights.

Not wishing to claim moral superiority, but I do stop on red. However I feel a dreadful label of &#039;uncool&#039; descend on me whenever I do so in London. Is it simply that we want to maintain momentum, or would more cyclists stop if they dared to be different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if Warburton has accurately stated your position, Jack, but I fear that by accepting a self-definition of &#8220;quasi-pedestrians&#8221; cyclists are one step away from being banned from the road at the whim of Highways officers. Surely that&#8217;s too high a price for the privilege of shooting red lights.</p>
<p>Not wishing to claim moral superiority, but I do stop on red. However I feel a dreadful label of &#8216;uncool&#8217; descend on me whenever I do so in London. Is it simply that we want to maintain momentum, or would more cyclists stop if they dared to be different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

